Carbon dating accuracy debate

Scientists at the Lamont-Doherty Geological Laboratory of Columbia University at Palisades, N.Y., reported today in the British journal Nature that some estimates of age based on carbon analyses were wrong by as much as 3,500 years.C14 is continually being created and decaying, leading to an equilibrium state in the atmosphere.When the carbon dioxide, containing C14 as well as stable C12 and C13, is taken in by plants it is no longer exposed to the intense cosmic ray bombardment in the upper atmosphere, so the carbon 14 isotope decays without being replenished.

With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth.

Since 1947, scientists have reckoned the ages of many old objects by measuring the amounts of radioactive carbon they contain.

New research shows, however, that some estimates based on carbon may have erred by thousands of years.

In principle, any material of plant or animal origin, including textiles, wood, bones and leather, can be dated by its content of carbon 14, a radioactive form of carbon in the environment that is incorporated by all living things.

Because it is radioactive, carbon 14 steadily decays into other substances.

Search for carbon dating accuracy debate:

carbon dating accuracy debate-90carbon dating accuracy debate-44carbon dating accuracy debate-59carbon dating accuracy debate-42

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “carbon dating accuracy debate”

  1. This page is just a collection of over 50 American statistics and facts. The main bias inherent on this page, is that these stats were mostly selected because they make America look bad.